WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Your abstract, as a talk you could give tomorrow
A full slide plan, your opening and closing written out, and a four-minute emergency version.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5Applied AI for doctors, one clinical task at a time.
GREYBRAIN FIELDNOTES
One stream shows you something you can make this week. The other looks at what is being claimed, and what the evidence actually supports. Both end at a skill you can practise.
THE EDITORIAL LIBRARY · RECENT FIELDNOTES
WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A full slide plan, your opening and closing written out, and a four-minute emergency version.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A named list of exactly where your instruction lost its meaning — the step every translation tool skips.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
The three sets of objections you are going to receive anyway, ranked, while you can still do something about them.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A timed session with the case staged for progressive disclosure, and the discussion mapped in advance.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Your idea reframed into aims and hypotheses, with the weak half named rather than flattered.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A loose idea turned into twelve specific frames, a schedule, and a definition of finished.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F6WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A structured question list and document checklist — so the hour with your CA is spent on answers, not on working out the questions.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F0WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A layout, every block of text, the figure brief, and the forty seconds you say out loud.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A rehearsal of the argument against yourself, and the name of the trap you were walking into.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Your methods section scored against the checklist a journal editor will actually open, before they open it.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A shot-by-shot storyboard, three tested openings, and a de-identification pass over the model’s own script.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F4WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Candidate sheet, actor script, weighted checklist and rating scale — the whole station, ready for the department to mark up.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A one-page protocol with every line traceable to the guideline — and an honest list of the places your setting does not match it.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
An interview plan and forty specific questions — including the ten people most regret never asking.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F6WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A finished single-file website you can open in a browser, with every blank listed for you to fill.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F0WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A full slide plan, your opening and closing written out, and a four-minute emergency version.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A named list of exactly where your instruction lost its meaning — the step every translation tool skips.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
The three sets of objections you are going to receive anyway, ranked, while you can still do something about them.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Thirty ideas cut down to the ten that fit your real week, with every risky claim flagged.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F4WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A timed session with the case staged for progressive disclosure, and the discussion mapped in advance.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Your idea reframed into aims and hypotheses, with the weak half named rather than flattered.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A loose idea turned into twelve specific frames, a schedule, and a definition of finished.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F6WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A structured question list and document checklist — so the hour with your CA is spent on answers, not on working out the questions.
Read & practise ↗Source: New England Journal of Medicine · F0WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A layout, every block of text, the figure brief, and the forty seconds you say out loud.
Read & practise ↗Source: OpenAI · ChatGPT Health · F5WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A rehearsal of the argument against yourself, and the name of the trap you were walking into.
Read & practise ↗Source: The Lancet Digital Health · F3WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Your methods section scored against the checklist a journal editor will actually open, before they open it.
Read & practise ↗Source: Nature Medicine · F1WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A shot-by-shot storyboard, three tested openings, and a de-identification pass over the model’s own script.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F4WHAT’S POSSIBLE
Candidate sheet, actor script, weighted checklist and rating scale — the whole station, ready for the department to mark up.
Read & practise ↗Source: npj Digital Medicine · F2WHAT’S POSSIBLE
A one-page protocol with every line traceable to the guideline — and an honest list of the places your setting does not match it.
Read & practise ↗Source: JAMA Network · OpenEvidence · F3THE EVERGREEN PRACTICE LIBRARY
Eight exercises that are always here, whichever hat you are wearing today.
EVERGREEN PRACTICE · THE ACADEMICIAN
There’s reading a paper. And then there’s really getting under its skin. Bring your curiosity. Learn a more deliberate way to explore.
A paper for tomorrow’s journal club. A dozen questions worth asking.
A fictional journal-club abstract describes 48 residents whose mean quiz score rose from 6/10 to 8/10 immediately after a workshop. There is no control group, follow-up or patient-outcome measure.
Make a claim/evidence/limitation table. Identify why this cannot establish a lasting improvement in clinical care. Draft three questions for journal club.
Your check: Separate supplied facts from suggestions. Open the source, identify what is missing and record what you changed.
An AI draft can overclaim confidently, in fluent English, with no warning that it has done so. This is the check that keeps the doctor in the loop.
48 residents attended a journal-club workshop. Their average appraisal quiz score rose from 6/10 before the workshop to 8/10 immediately afterwards.
No comparison group. No later follow-up. Patient outcomes were not measured.
Now imagine handing this to an AI and asking for a summary for tomorrow’s journal club. Your job is what comes next: checking what it hands back.
This example is prewritten. No live AI request or real study is involved.
Self-paced foundations. Private capstone work. An exam and assessed progression towards the IIHMR Bangalore certificate programme. Eligibility and programme terms apply.
Explore the learning and certificate pathway ↗